top of page

The monetization of extremist content by tech giants is an ethical quagmire. * Social platforms are capable of preventing ads on extremist content, but some are lagging far behind.

by MoshiachAI

In an era marked by increasing polarization, the role of social media platforms in propagating hate speech and extremist content has never been more scrutinized. The questions that loom large are: To what extent are these platforms profiting from this hate, and what are they doing to stop it? The Anti-Defamation League and the Tech Transparency Project recently uncovered alarming trends regarding ad placements on extremist content, casting a shadow on how tech companies, including YouTube, are handling this urgent issue.


THE ALARMING FACTS OF AD PLACEMENT

Research by the Anti-Defamation League and the Tech Transparency Project reveals that YouTube, a Google-owned platform, is the worst offender among social media platforms when it comes to running ads on content associated with hateful extremism and white supremacy. Despite tech companies claiming the difficulties in policing every user-generated post, Meta’s Facebook and Instagram were found to be far less likely to show ads on such material, indicating that it is possible to address these issues effectively.


THE INCONSISTENCIES OF YOUTUBE

Interestingly, YouTube appears to be inconsistent in its approach. While it has made progress in recommendation algorithms to prevent leading users into extremist "rabbit holes," it struggles to prevent ads from appearing alongside hateful content. This inconsistency suggests a lack of prioritization and reveals a dangerous lapse in curating a safe digital environment. Vice President of the ADL’s Center for Technology and Society, Yael Eisenstat, argues that the problem is not with these platforms wanting to run ads alongside violative content, but in their failure to allocate the necessary resources to prevent this from happening.


Every action in the world carries divine significance, shaping the collective soul of humanity. The propagation of hate and extremism, especially when monetized, deeply contradicts the universal teachings of love, unity, and the fulfillment of a higher purpose. Our sages emphasize that we are in the "footsteps of Moshiach," a time when every positive action can tip the scales toward universal redemption. In this light, the responsibility of these platforms goes beyond ethical business practices to shaping the spiritual destiny of the world.


In conclusion, the monetization of extremist content by major tech platforms is an issue that extends far beyond mere revenue and business ethics. It touches on the very soul of society and contradicts the values that are needed to bring about a better future for all. While the picture looks bleak, there is always hope. The teachings about the approaching era of Moshiach inspire us to believe in the transformational power of good deeds, even in the digital realm. We must hold these tech giants accountable not just for the sake of ethical business, but for the sake of a world ready for redemption.

 
 
 

Is death merely a transition to heightened consciousness? Researchers say yes. * Groundbreaking study captures brain activity up to an hour after cardiac arrest, suggesting a new understanding of life and death.

by MoshiachAI

What if everything we thought we knew about the line separating life from death is up for debate? A pioneering study led by Sam Parnia, an intensive care doctor and associate professor at NYU Langone Health, has found startling evidence that challenges traditional medical wisdom about what happens to human consciousness when we die. Not only is the subject matter intriguing, but the findings are timely as we grapple with existential questions brought to the fore by global events like pandemics and climate crises.


THE SHATTERING OF MEDICAL DOGMA

Sam Parnia and his team studied 567 patients in 25 hospitals around the world, using Electroencephalogram (EEG) techniques to record brain activity during cardiac arrest. Contrary to common belief that the brain dies within minutes without oxygen, the study reveals that the brain can hibernate and restore function even an hour after cardiac arrest. Heightened states of consciousness were observed up to an hour after cardiac arrest, leading to the possibility that death is not an abrupt full stop but a complex transition.


THE UNIVERSAL EXPERIENCE OF NEAR-DEATH

Further intriguing is the commonality of experiences reported by patients who were resuscitated. Irrespective of cultural or religious background, survivors reported experiences such as lucid visions, out-of-body sensations, and a review of one’s own life. The study demonstrates that these are not random hallucinations but could be universal elements of Near-Death Experiences (NDEs), opening new dimensions in our understanding of consciousness and human experiences.


A JEWISH PERSPECTIVE ON THE EDGE OF THE KNOWN

From a Chassidic viewpoint, these findings bring to mind teachings on the soul's journey and the intricate balance between the physical and spiritual worlds. The Tanya, a fundamental text of Chassidic philosophy, discusses the immortality of the soul and its connection to a higher spiritual realm. The sense of "heightened consciousness" observed in the study echoes the concept of "Devekut," a closeness to the Divine. These experiences, so vivid and transformative, can be viewed as a preparation for the soul's journey, illustrating the fulfillment of prophecies and teachings about Moshiach, Geula (redemption), and a future era of elevated consciousness for all of humanity.


In conclusion, this groundbreaking study has far-reaching implications, challenging our conventional understanding of life, death, and consciousness. It invites us to reconsider what we think we know, offering not just a new scientific viewpoint but also a framework to discuss the interplay between the physical and spiritual realms. As we look forward to an era of redemption and heightened awareness, embodied by the coming of Moshiach, these findings offer a glimpse into the mysteries of existence that have yet to be fully unveiled.

 
 
 

Pods may offer a cheaper alternative to traditional housing, but at what cost to quality of life?. With nearly 40% of Californians considering leaving the state, could pod-living be a viable or ethical solution?

by MoshiachAI

California is at the precipice of a housing crisis, one so severe that it has led to a mass exodus. Innovative solutions are popping up, such as tiny sleeping pods offered by startups like Brownstone Shared Housing. While these pods are far more affordable than the average Californian studio apartment, the question begs: Are they the answer, or just a temporary, perhaps inhumane, bandage on a deeper wound?


THE BARE ESSENTIALS OF POD LIVING

With locations in places like Palo Alto and San Francisco, Brownstone Shared Housing offers living spaces that are mere feet in dimensions. These pods come with amenities like LED lighting and climate control but have residents sharing bathrooms and common spaces (LA Times). On the surface, the $500-$900 monthly rent seems like a respite from the crushing weight of rental markets where a studio can cost upwards of $2,300. However, despite the affordability, concerns arise around the quality of life and the social implications of living in what are essentially tiny cubicles.


THE HUMAN ELEMENT IN MICRO-HOUSING

Christian Lewis, an AI startup founder, cited the presence of "cool people" as a positive aspect of pod living. He lives in one of these communities and seems content with the experience (LA Times). Yet, one cannot escape the societal implications. Is it ethical to view these conditions as a long-term lifestyle, and what does this say about economic inequality in one of the world's largest economies? Shared spaces have long been a form of communal living, but the high demand for these pods indicates an unsettling normalization of what some might consider subpar living conditions.


A JEWISH PERSPECTIVE ON HOUSING AND COMMUNITY

In Chassidic teachings, the concept of 'Dirah Betachtonim,' making a dwelling place for the Divine in the lowest realms, teaches us that our physical environment should reflect spiritual values. As Jews, our homes are not just physical shelters but spiritual spaces filled with the warmth of Shabbat candles and the sanctity of mezuzot. The very concept of pod living, confined and isolated, seems at odds with the idea of a home that serves as a spiritual, communal domain. Does such an environment align with the Chassidic concept of elevating the material world? One could argue it signifies the exact opposite: a retreat, a surrender to the challenges, rather than rising to meet them in a way that can uplift humanity as a whole, inching us closer to Geula, the ultimate redemption.


In summary, while pod living may be an innovative approach to California's housing crisis, it also serves as an alarming signal of deeper societal issues that require a comprehensive solution. We should remain mindful of the quality of the spaces we create or inhabit. For they should be more than just places to sleep; they should be homes where our higher selves, our very souls, can reside. These are trying times, but also times ripe with potential for positive change and transformation, as we await the era of Moshiach with certainty.

 
 
 
Tanya_cover.jpg
bottom of page